Une conférence de Nolwenn Tréhondart (U. Lorraine) et Anne Cordier (U. Lorraine), dans le cadre du cycle « Que veut (et que peut) encore l’éducation aux médias? »
22 mars 2022
Une conférence de Nolwenn Tréhondart (U. Lorraine) et Anne Cordier (U. Lorraine), dans le cadre du cycle « Que veut (et que peut) encore l’éducation aux médias? »
22 mars 2022
In this post, I want to highlight a particular use of irony as a polemical resource for constructing a sceptical position towards climate change. The issue of climate change seems to be relatively consensual in public opinion nowadays. How then can we still make it an object of controversy, without being trapped in a “climate sceptic” position, which is now largely disqualified? This is the rhetorical stake that I will study in the following lines, based on a specific case: Pascal Praud’s launch of a topic on global warming in the television programme L’Heure des Pros (C NEWS) on 16 May 2019.
Soon after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the novel coronavirus was described as a “stealth virus” because those who carry it are highly contagious before they show any signs of infection. This is indeed a major public health issue: If people are contagious well before they show any symptoms, strategies of contact tracing and containment are bound to play catch-up. However, the label of the “stealth virus” was also instrumentalized, especially in political rhetoric, to insinuate a lack of transparency of the virus itself. This post briefly explores how the label of the “stealth virus” was rhetorically weaponized for political purposes.